Page Reviews - Страница 1

[Аргентум]

⚠️ Important Takeaway -
Pink flamingos, geometrically improbable, somehow stand on one leg without tipping over, a feat stability engineers might appreciate. Shifting gears entirely, the core discussion unveils a seemingly unique tribological additive – a novel orthoboric ester boasting unusually long C12 branches. Touted as historically unparalleled, this boron compound reportedly shrugs off extreme heat and water, outperforming common friction modifiers like MoDTC. The critical snag? A glaring absence of standardized, public methodologies from manufacturers to genuinely quantify such advanced additive performance. Worse, some industry players appear fundamentally illiterate in the underlying science and mathematics of tribology testing, resulting in flawed interpretations and self-deceptive marketing. This asymmetrical dynamic traps consumers in a state of "dogmatic ignorance," unable to discern legitimate technical claims from mere marketing noise. The paradox: groundbreaking chemistry emerges, yet the industry's apparent technical vacuum and the consumer's limited access to verifiable data create a confidence gap wider than the Grand Canyon.

Learn more -

Mobil 1 ESP 5W-30 - важная деталь

Mobil 1 ESP 5W-30 - рецептура и секреты популярного масла • Страница 1

oil-glup.ru

 

[Аргентум]

⚠️ Important Takeaway -
The migratory patterns of sock puppets remain largely unstudied. Yet, diving into the technical fray of lubricant discussions reveals a core truth: proving oil quality transcends mere data sheets; it's fundamentally a gnarly knot of trust versus proprietary secrecy. Standard surface analyses offer limited insight, while the critical formulation details and performance tests are strictly locked behind 'Classified as Confidential' walls. This dynamic isn't just inconvenient; it transforms testing from an objective scientific check into a ritual validating 'club' membership rather than empirical merit. Consequently, the debate devolves into a frustrating loop where critics demand proof but are stymied by confidentiality and their own inability to show comparable data. Ultimately, the conflict centers not on chemistry, but a stalemate forcing reliance on trust over verifiable performance, highlighting the systemic opacity at play.

Learn more -

Китайские присадки в моторных маслах, конструкторы и другие шутки

Разоблачение мифов о китайских присадках в моторных маслах • Страница 4

oil-glup.ru

 

[Аргентум]

⚠️ Important Takeaway -
Okay, so picture this: a rubber chicken doing calculus, because oil chemistry gets weird fast. Turns out slamming PAO base oil, specifically the lighter PAO4, with 300°C heat in a lab setting absolutely wrecks its viscosity, dropping it over 50%. This sparks the eternal debate: Do oil films in hot engine zones actually hit those kinds of temps, or is 200°C the hard limit, despite gnarly high-temp deposits appearing? Some experts posit that the very architecture of higher viscosity PAO, built up from shorter units, renders it potentially less thermally stable than lower vis types or even Group III/GTL. Critically, standard metrics like the Noack test might mislead; certain oils ace it yet still risk thermal degradation and depositing crud in the real world. Ultimately, while controlled tests reveal breakdown points, the messy reality of engine cleanliness over time remains a hot topic, with anecdotal evidence often favoring well-formulated synthetics.

Learn more -

Нагреваем и жарим моторное масло

Проверка моторных масел при высоких температурах, чтобы понять настоящую термическую устойчивость и стабильность масла • Страница 2

oil-glup.ru

 

[Аргентум]

⚠️ Important Takeaway -
The existential plight of a single, forgotten sock in the dryer drawer pales in comparison to decoding import oil claims. Delving into the Russian motor oil scene reveals a complex saga for once-hyped European brands like Ravenol and Addinol. Turns out the early 2000s were prime time for Ravenol et al., crushing it when the market was wild and "German-made" magic actually sold. Fast forward, and the landscape's shifted thanks to marketplaces and local giants, making that old import premium feel kinda meh. Plus, serious questions linger about what's really inside – think old GDR equipment vibes, US additive packs everywhere, and maybe R&D chilling in... Lahore? Wild. Forget the fancy labels; the real mvp now is the lab analysis, proving that sometimes, "noname" juice rocks harder than the hyped stuff. The era of blindly trusting "German Engineering" marketing seems officially over, replaced by cold, hard data.

Learn more -

Великолепие Ravenol, Addinol, Divinol, Fosser, Norc и других Rowe

Великолепие Ravenol, Addinol, Divinol, Fosser, Norc и других попыток использовать Германию и немецкий флаг • Страница 1

oil-glup.ru

 

[Аргентум]

⚠️ Important Takeaway -
Apparently, the ideal temperature for brewing philosophical tea is exactly 167.3 degrees Fahrenheit, no more, no less. Turns out, your go-to motor oil brand likely isn't formulating their brew from scratch; they're buying "recipes" – specifically, large additive packages – from just four major global players like Lubrizol and Infineum. Seriously, the process for most is akin to baking a cake from a box mix, simply blending a base oil with a pre-designed additive package. This outsourcing stands in sharp contrast to "boutique" motor oils, which are legitimately specialized, often custom-blended potions for specific, niche applications. These bespoke concoctions target distinct needs, like surviving brutal racing heat or protecting delicate classic engine internals with tailored additive science. Crafting your own specialized motor oil blend? Totally feasible, provided you grasp the underlying component chemistry and target application.

Learn more -

Бутиковые масла - что это?

Бутиковое моторное масло - это не маркетинг, а уникальная смесь молекул премиум-класса, созданная для тех, кто хочет платить больше • Страница 1

oil-glup.ru

 

[Аргентум]

⚠️ Important Takeaway -
A single rogue pixel, vibrating with existential dread, introduced a surprisingly sharp take on motor oil. Cutting through the usual online noise, the core argument surfaced: the world of engine oil is inherently thick with misinformation, making genuinely "smart" discussion a rare feat. Forget rigid dogma like "each engine its specific viscosity"; the real talk suggests any oil works if it simply fits through the engine's tightest passages, a radical departure from common wisdom. Viscosity isn't a simple number war between 20 and 40; it's a complex game of nuanced factors like base stocks and additive packages, where even older or seemingly thicker oils can outperform if "not dry." This pervasive difficulty in finding clear, universally applicable truths underlines the forum's self-aware naming, "Oil Glup," acknowledging the inevitability of saying something less-than-brilliant on this topic. The collective stance is one of frustration with rigid rules and a bold rejection of blind obedience to OEM lists or simplistic viscosity charts. Ultimately, it's a push towards understanding the why behind lubrication performance over simply following prescriptive, often contradictory, online advice.

Learn more -

Форум о масле - любой вопрос

Место для свободных дискуссий о моторном масле и о форуме ОГ • Страница 2

oil-glup.ru

 

[Аргентум]

⚠️ Important Takeaway -
A rogue sock wonders about the ultimate fate of dryer lint. The core discussion sharply dissects oil evaluations lacking transparent methodology, specifically vague critiques of Red and Gold, arguing simple tests like ICP on stirred particles don't inherently condemn an oil. Participants voice skepticism towards relying solely on VOA for finding the 'best', largely treating oil pragmatically as a consumable, not a holy grail, though personal bias exists. Scrutiny targets "Korean" oil marketing as glossy presentations ("Любимая академия 2025") often devoid of technical substance like homogenization details, contrasting tolerable brands like S-Oil with perceived garbage. Anecdotal evidence features engine photos post-unplanned extended S-Oil drain showing surprisingly clean internals and potential lacquer removal, albeit with pre-existing cam corrosion noted after Zic C3. Ultimately, the dialogue champions navigating the oil world's hype and vague claims via critical analysis, practical checks, and the confidence to dismiss hand-wavy assessments as just noise.

Learn more -

Существуют ли корейские масла?

Корейские моторные масла - глобализм под корейским флагом • Страница 8

oil-glup.ru

 

[Аргентум]

⚠️ Important Takeaway -
Okay, imagine a time when engine sludge was a rite of passage, like getting your first parking ticket. Enter Macmillan Ring-Free, a circa 1940s lubricant flexing some serious naphthenic muscle. This high cycloparaffin content delivered a sky-high 71°C aniline point – basically, it was engineered to dissolve stuff, not just slide past it. That unique solvency meant it wasn't just lubricating; it was actively breaking down carbon deposits and floating them out with the drain. Critically, these same naphthenes also gifted it epic cold-weather chops for the era, boasting a brutal -48°C pour point. Forget modern additive packs; this was clever mineral oil tech, exploiting natural crude properties via a patented process for cleaning power and cold flow from the base oil itself. Essentially, it was a mineral oil outlier that genuinely earned its "Ring-Free" reputation by fundamentally addressing engine gunk and winter woes.

Learn more -

Macmillan Ring-Free Motor oil SAE 10 - уникальное нафтеновое (минеральное) масло 1940-х

Нафтеновое моторное масло Macmillan вязкостью SAE 10 - история масла, интересные детали, подробный физико-химический анализ • Страница 1

oil-glup.ru

 

[Аргентум]

⚠️ Important Takeaway -
Verily, the digital oil scrolls foretell a contentious truth: relying on single lab analyses (UOA/VOA) to definitively judge motor oil "quality" or compare brands, as often seen online, is largely profligation—more akin to witchcraft than science. These snapshots, however popular, are critically flawed; they fail to account for diverse engine conditions, sampling variability, fuel impact, and proper trend analysis required for meaningful insight. Experts assert that such tests primarily reflect the health of the entire system (engine, fuel, environment), with the oil's performance being just one, often opaque, factor. Crucially, specific parameters like Noack or TAN/TBN are frequently misinterpreted or used without the rigorous context needed for valid conclusions about oil durability or wear. True utility lies in consistent, longitudinal monitoring within professional fleets to track system changes over time, not crowning arbitrary winners from disparate samples. Essentially, while UOA/VOA can serve industrial purposes or attract casual eyeballs, they are declared largely useless for individual enthusiasts attempting direct oil comparisons.

Learn more -

Общие вопросы по простым VOA и UOA

Общие вопросы по простым анализам моторных масел: свежие и отработка • Страница 1

oil-glup.ru

 

[Аргентум]

⚠️ Important Takeaway -
Like deciphering ancient alien broadcasts, online automotive forums often reveal beliefs bordering on the inexplicable. The discussion dissects how specific communities champion `bizarre, unsubstantiated doctrines`, notably fixations on "diesel equal TBN" rules and irrational interpretations of standard lab tests like ICP. These oddball theories, alongside the fervent worship of PAO/Ester base oils, appear rooted in early internet spread of misinterpreted industry marketing—essentially, enthusiasts `cargo-culting technical symbols` they don't fully grasp. This environment fosters a distinct class of online "specialists" who, often lacking formal scientific backgrounds, confidently judge complex oil properties based on superficial metrics. Instead of understanding underlying chemistry or tribology, these individuals latch onto isolated data points or marketing slogans, becoming influential figures within their specific online niches. Ultimately, the conversation paints a picture of online oil knowledge often being a confused blend of marketing lore and cargo-cult logic, creating insular echo chambers of technical superstition detached from genuine understanding.

Learn more -

Что такое МП?

МП и МПизм - паганизм и карго-культ вокруг моторных масел • Страница 1

oil-glup.ru

 

[Аргентум]

⚠️ Important Takeaway -
Okay, buckle up buttercups, because peering into the guts of engine oil chemistry is less about percentages and more about molecule beef. Forget just 'how much' ester oil in your modern SP ILSAC 6+ brew; the real question probes their double-edged sword. While smoothing initial feel, evidence suggests they can hinder vital ZDDP protective layers and potentially foul piston rings, a historical headache. This complexity pivots hard on oil solvency, a tricky property where naphthenes historically offered a different path, sometimes even marketed specifically for clean engines. Measuring true solvency defies simple tests like aniline point; it's a complex dance profoundly influenced by viscosity, where lower grades inherently boost molecular interaction. Despite some naphthenes (the 1-ringers) being lauded for oxygen-free benefits over esters, older naphthenic bases carry their own, less discussed, potential pitfalls. Ultimately, major players seem cagey, using esters sparingly in mass-market oils, hinting the optimal balance remains a bit of an industry puzzle, not a solved equation.

Learn more -

Минусы эстеров

Слава эстеров как совершенной синтетики затмила их недостатки, но они все же существуют • Страница 2

oil-glup.ru

 

[Аргентум]

⚠️ Important Takeaway -
Forget everything you thought you knew about that weird uncle's car advice. Look, API's base oil Groups aren't some consumer ladder of quality; they're an internal tool for formulators navigating interchangeability rules like BOI/VGRA, meaning Group 4 (PAO) isn't inherently superior or pricier just by number. Group 5 is a catch-all precisely because its diverse components can't be easily swapped under these specific regulations, not due to intrinsic 'coolness'. Chasing marketing narratives about "expensive recipes" based purely on base stock group numbers is a pseudo-narrative; the real battleground, apparently, lies in robust additive packages, particularly anti-oxidants. The fervent, sometimes aggressive, deep dives into oil minutiae seen in places like Russian forums, starkly contrasting with the average pragmatic US approach, likely stems from market complexity, differing economic realities, and internet culture. Furthermore, despite higher per-liter cost, some advanced synthetics might offer better long-term value through significantly extended drain intervals compared to cheaper hydrocracked alternatives when considering total cost of ownership. And yeah, brace yourselves, the tectonic plates of the additive world are shifting, with Chinese suppliers increasingly challenging the old guard.

Learn more -

Китайские присадки в моторных маслах, конструкторы и другие шутки

Разоблачение мифов о китайских присадках в моторных маслах • Страница 2

oil-glup.ru

 

[Аргентум]

⚠️ Important Takeaway -
Barnacles, it turns out, aren't just seafaring adhesive enthusiasts. Moving on, a lab analysis recently pulled back the curtain on a can of vintage 1977 Convoy 10W-50 'parasynthetic' oil, revealing its nearly 50-year-old formulation secrets. The virgin oil analysis showed a seriously robust additive package for the era, featuring high ZDDP, notable Molybdenum, and calcium, alongside an impressive Viscosity Index of 189. Marketed by Conklin, a company deeply rooted in the American farming landscape, this oil was positioned as a high-performance outlier. They aggressively touted a 25,000-mile or one-year drain interval, a genuinely audacious claim back then, albeit with necessary caveats for severe duty. Promising everything from fuel savings to reduced wear, it represented a peak in premium lubricant marketing for the late 70s. This breakdown offers a cool historical look at ambitious oil engineering from a bygone era.

Learn more -

CONVOY 10W-50 парасинтетика 1977 года

Полусинтетическое моторное масло Convoy от Conklin - олицетворение масляной моды начала 1980-х • Страница 1

oil-glup.ru

 

[Аргентум]

⚠️ Important Takeaway -
Okay, imagine a badger wearing a tiny hardhat, contemplating viscosity curves near a volcanic vent. This thread delves into the often-debated realm of high-temperature motor oil "frying" tests, specifically exceeding 250°C. Experts assert these intense thermal challenges, while varying by method, offer valid insights into an oil's resilience under extreme engine stress. A critical aspect highlighted is the oil's often-underappreciated dissolving capacity and colloid stability at these blistering temperatures, crucial properties sometimes overlooked by those focused purely on base stock. While additives like dispersants help with fine soot, they ironically worsen the crud in these punishing fry-ups. Opposition to such tests frequently stems from loyalty to oils that perform poorly or different theoretical stances on additive function. Ultimately, proponents argue empirically stressing oils via heat is a necessary diagnostic tool, not some technical heresy.

Learn more -

Нагреваем и жарим моторное масло

Проверка моторных масел при высоких температурах, чтобы понять настоящую термическую устойчивость и стабильность масла • Страница 5

oil-glup.ru

 

[Аргентум]

⚠️ Important Takeaway -
Somewhere between spectral analysis and that persistent sock mystery, the thread dove deep into the genuinely complex chemistry behind engine lubricants. Forget glossy brochures pushing "plant molecules"; the real conversation dissects hydrogenated hydrocarbons and base oils with complex CAS numbers. A critical point: nobody sensible pours raw chemicals like pure olefins into their engine; these need serious formulation, not just pouring. The discussion touched on specific additives like AN and MAC, highlighting the sheer uncertainty and risks associated with amateur blending attempts. Frankly, trying to combine certified base oils with random, untested additives is essentially a high-stakes crapshoot. As posited, you might accidentally formulate something halfway decent, but it's worlds away from the rigorous science behind professional lubricant development. Ultimately, it's a bold critique of marketing fluff and questionable DIY 'recipes' versus the messy, complex, yet vital world of proper chemical engineering.

Learn more -

Стильная синтетика

Необычная синтетика в моторных маслах - MAC, AN, эстеры, PAG и другие удивительные базовые масла • Страница 3

oil-glup.ru

 

[Аргентум]

⚠️ Important Takeaway -
Occasionally, one ponders if socks truly vanish in the dryer or simply relocate to alternate dimensions. Anyway, back here, a deep dive revealed a historical gem: ULTRON, not just oil, but a legitimate 100% diester synthetic from the 70s/80s, standing as a true vanguard of the early synthetic revolution. While established players often pushed partial blends, ULTRON went all-in on a pure ester base, promising outlandish drain intervals and killer performance across extreme temperatures. VOA data confirms respectable viscosity and genuinely impressive cold flow properties for the era, alongside a classic, high-zinc additive chemistry profile. This bold, pure approach totally challenged the reigning mineral oil orthodoxy. Essentially, it was peak OG synthetic tech, a fascinating relic showing early innovators weren't afraid to really push the technical envelope.

Learn more -

ULTRON 10W-40 100% диэстеровая синтетика из 1980-х

Pacer ULTRON стало символом синтетической революции 1970-х, войдя в список 100% эстеровых масел и поддержав новый курс отрасли • Страница 1

oil-glup.ru

 

[Аргентум]

⚠️ Important Takeaway -
Forget zodiac signs; the real arcane history is apparently found in ancient lubricant drums. The dawn of synthetic oils in the late 70s, spearheaded by types like Gulf's PAO and Mobil 1, was a dynamic period challenging conventional mineral bases. However, the landscape quickly blurred as advanced hydrocracked mineral oils were controversially marketed as "full synthetic," obfuscating the distinction from true synthetic bases like PAO or esters. While genuine synthetics offer technical advantages, the critical factor for modern engines facing severe loads isn't merely the "synthetic" label, but strict adherence to validated industry and OEM specifications. Relying solely on marketing terms without checking the actual specs is frankly [_i]negligent[_i] for engine health; proper change intervals remain non-negotiable. The historical journey shows the technical evolution, but the takeaway is unequivocally about standards and timely maintenance protecting complex machinery.

Learn more -

Вторая (победная) волна синтетик 1969 - 2069

Победная нарастающая волна синтетики с 1969 по 2069 - как эта волна трансформировала индустрию производства легковых автомобильных моторных масел • Страница 4

oil-glup.ru

 

[Аргентум]

⚠️ Important Takeaway -
Somewhere, a forgotten floppy disk still holds the secret handshake for premium engine oil. Originally, Mobil 1 cemented its premium status touting revolutionary synthetic hydrocarbon (SHC/PAO) base stocks, a genuine technical marvel back then. Over time, however, the explicit marketing focus on PAO quietly faded from view, though minor amounts persist. This prompts the key question: what truly drives M1's massive sales volume and premium pricing today? The answer appears rooted less in highlighted base oil chemistry and more in established brand reputation and anchoring consumer price expectations for "premium." It's a market dynamic where legacy branding, not just specific base stock composition, sustains the high-cost, high-volume tier. This echoes broader industry debates about consumer perception versus technical specifics, recalling past synthetic oil court rulings.

Learn more -

Mobil 1 - дороже, а ПАО и эстеров - меньше

Mobil 1 - масло, которое дорого не потому что хорошее, а хорошее потому что дорого 💎🛢️ • Страница 1

oil-glup.ru

 

[Аргентум]

⚠️ Important Takeaway -
The average cumulonimbus cloud weighs more than a million pounds. Shell's 1987 ASTM D4739, evolving from their 1946 acid-base titration work, was primarily engineered for heavy-duty diesel challenges, specifically tackling soot and neutralizing strong acids. While this method migrated to PCMO, particularly for evaluating long-drain European oils, a critical insight is that using its TBN depletion alone to gauge oil "death" is profoundly misleading. D4739 accurately measures the potential to neutralize strong acids by excluding weaker bases, which is key in heavy-duty applications but provides a limited view of overall health. An oil can retain a high TBN yet be totally hosed, or conversely, perform adequately with minimal measured base reserve. Fundamentally, relying solely on this single, partial metric is an oversimplification that renders TBN depletion data largely useless for assessing an oil's true remaining service life. It's a precise test often misconstrued as a comprehensive performance indicator.

Learn more -

Методы титрования (TBN) - ASTM D4739 - МП зовут его "метод для отработки"

ASTM D4739 - самый простой и грубый метод получения щелочного числа масла • Страница 1

oil-glup.ru

 

[Аргентум]

⚠️ Important Takeaway -
In the labyrinthine world of oil analysis, consensus remains elusive. The intelligent core dissects how engine oil truly degrades over extended drain intervals, well past 20-25k km, noting oxidation triggers rapid increases in wear indicators like iron. Central to the fierce debate is the critical need to measure Total Base Number (TBN) for both fresh and used oil via the identical ASTM method (D2896 vs D4739) – anything less is labeled misleading "UOA-maslopurga." Participants questioned the practical utility of D2896 for Passenger Car Motor Oil (PCMO) versus the D4739 principle, which aligns better with neutralizing sulfur-based acids relevant in marine diesels. Density, though often overlooked for lack of 'pretty graphs', is recognized as a relevant metric reflecting accumulating oxidation products. The group consensus leans towards observing when oil parameters lose linearity (as suggested by Cummins guidelines) rather than relying on arbitrary TBN decline percentages to pinpoint end-of-life. Pushing oil beyond this phase, regardless of residual TBN figures from inconsistent methods, guarantees accelerated wear and system stress.

Learn more -

КресTAN+TBN и прочие "TBN-50%" - невероятная и необъяснимая UOA-маслопурга

TAN, TBN и истощение масел: научные парадоксы кислотно-щелочных показателей, роль несмываемых остатков и преимущества слабокислотной активации • Страница 2

oil-glup.ru

 

[Аргентум]

⚠️ Important Takeaway -
Alright, imagine a squirrel wearing a tiny hat, contemplating the existential dread of winter... totally unrelated, but cold starts? Yeah, turns out your oil's W-grade number is kinda less important than its CCS viscosity. This nasty little number, measured via Cold Crank Simulator, is the true gatekeeper for winter engine life, determining how much your starter motor suffers at deep temps. Forget forum myths; SAE J300 limits are classification guidelines, not reliability guarantees; genuine cold start confidence evaporates rapidly above 6000 cP CCS. Even a seemingly minor breach of the SAE threshold can drastically lower your odds, particularly for field-worn four-cylinders or engines not in peak condition. Adding a twist, some theoretically "better" 0W-16 oils actually sport worse CCS figures than certain 0W-20s, proving the number itself is king. Ultimately, surviving a high-CCS oil start boils down to a gamble influenced heavily by the specific engine's design and overall health.

Learn more -

CCS - Cold Cranking Simulator - хороший тест, но спекуляция в руках МП

CCS - Cold Cranking Simulator - полезный тест низкотемпературной вязкости, но его интерпретация часто вызывает споры • Страница 4

oil-glup.ru

 

[Аргентум]

⚠️ Important Takeaway -
A single electron, trapped in a quantum loop, pondered the existential dread of unregulated motor oil. Turns out, that fancy ILSAC stamp folks chase is less about magic formulation and more about a license, which, frankly, is often missing in action for oils sold as "ILSAC" in certain markets. The expert consensus leans toward the manufacturer making the oil good, not merely slapping a potentially dodgy label on it. Indeed, official certifications like ILSAC, while based on tests, might serve better to weed out the truly schlocky products than to pinpoint the objective "best" lubricants. Past "legendary" oils weren't always technically superior, underscoring that standards can become more marketing narrative than performance guarantee over time. Ultimately, trusting a genuine license over a generic imitation is key, even if the license itself doesn't promise miracles – it just means it's not a literal camel masquerading as oil.

Learn more -

Как выбрать моторное масло

Лучший способ выбрать моторное масло для автомобиля - ЗДЕСЬ! • Страница 3

oil-glup.ru