In the fiercely competitive annals of automotive innovation, few absences are as striking, or as curious, as the almost complete disappearance of the original story behind synthetic motor oil. A genuine technological milestone, born of American chemical ingenuity, seems to have quietly slipped through the cracks of mainstream memory. It was not discredited, nor debunked; it is simply absent.
Today, the dominant narrative belongs to Amsoil. Its claim to fame, that it produced “the world’s first synthetic motor oil” for consumer vehicles, has achieved almost unquestioned status. This assertion appears on labels, in trade literature, and across countless enthusiast forums, repeated as a kind of founding myth.
But under even modest scrutiny, that story begins to fray.
Amsoil’s market entry between 1972 and 1973 was indeed significant. A fully synthetic passenger car motor oil based on diesters, drawing from aerospace lubrication chemistry, it marked a highly visible moment in the evolution of consumer lubricants. But it was not the first.
Before Amsoil, there was All-Proof Synthetic, another synthetic PCMO formulated with esters, which was already commercially available. Industry records suggest it reached shelves before Amsoil, yet has since faded into obscurity. This might be due to limited marketing, or perhaps because of the sheer gravity of the myth that followed.
And yet, even All-Proof was not the beginning.
The true earliest entry into this field may date not to the 1970s, but to the 1940s, with a synthetic oil developed by Union Carbide and Carbon Corporation, the same company renowned for the Prestone brand. Archival evidence points to the existence of a synthetic motor oil based on polyalkylene glycol (PAG), released to the public under the Prestone oil name. It was marketed, sold, and distributed not as an experimental fluid for wartime or a niche aviation product, but as a lubricant for everyday American automobiles (PCMO).
Company documents from that era describe a formulation aimed at new or freshly rebuilt engines. Its chemical foundation, closely related to Union Carbide’s "Ucon" series of lubricants, was said to possess powerful cleaning properties, dissolving gum, varnish, and carbon. Most radically for its time, it promised significantly extended oil change intervals, an idea that would not re-enter mainstream discourse for decades.
This was not a prototype. It was not a footnote in research and development. It was on store shelves, appearing in two distinct periods: first in the late 1940s, and again in the early 1950s.
So why has this history been so thoroughly displaced?
That is the question no one seems eager to answer. Today, Amsoil’s founding claim stands largely unchallenged, not just by consumers, but by the very petrochemical giants like ExxonMobil and Shell, among others. These corporations possess the records and institutional knowledge to confirm or correct the story. Whether due to oversight, convenience, or simple inertia, no one seems in a hurry to reopen the file.
It is tempting to draw conclusions. But even without venturing into speculation, the pattern is notable. The deeper one digs, the clearer it becomes that an entire chapter of synthetic oil history, an American chapter, has been overwritten not with denials, but with silence.
None of this erases Amsoil’s contributions. Nor does it diminish the revolution in lubrication chemistry that followed in the 1970s. It does, however, raise questions about how historical memory is shaped, what gets remembered, and what simply slips away.
Whether by chance or quiet consensus, the first synthetic motor oil did not just lose its market.
It lost its story.
oil-glup.ru
